Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
This is a solid attempt, and the core file-moving logic works correctly. However, I'm requesting one change to ensure all requirements are fully met. The test suite is missing a case to verify that the application fails when the source path is a directory, which is a key requirement. Please add a test to tests/moveFiles.test.js that attempts to move a directory and asserts that an error is thrown.
Additionally, as a suggestion for improvement, the use of an empty try...catch block in src/app.js to control logic is an anti-pattern. It's better to explicitly check for a file's existence with a function like fs.existsSync() to make your code's intent clearer and avoid hiding unexpected errors.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/app.js
Outdated
| fs.renameSync(src, dest); | ||
|
|
||
| return; | ||
| } catch {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using a try...catch block with an empty catch to control the program's logic is considered an anti-pattern. This approach can hide unexpected errors (e.g., permission issues) and makes the code's intent less clear. It's better to explicitly check for the destination's existence with fs.existsSync() and then branch your logic based on that result.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great work on the refactor and implementing the logic in src/app.js to prevent moving directories! The application code itself is excellent. However, this requires changes because the test suite is still missing the corresponding test case to validate this behavior, which was the main point of the last review. It's crucial that every requirement has a test to prove it works and prevent future regressions. Please add a test to tests/moveFiles.test.js that attempts to move a source directory and asserts that the script fails as expected. You are very close to the finish line!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
|
I am not mentor to write tests for a plain task with README, plz notify mentor if you have any suggestions about tests. |
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, the pull request review was unsuccessful for the following reasons:
Warning
No changes were made in the pull request since the last review. Please make sure that you have added files to the pull request and committed the changes.
[CODE: NCM]
If the issue is within your control, please address it.
The next review attempt will automatically launch in about 1 hour.
If you believe this is an error or need assistance, please contact the support team.
|
I am not mentor to write tests for a plain task with README, plz notify mentor if you have any suggestions about tests. |
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
I am approving this submission as an educational override to help you progress, but please review the feedback below for a crucial missing piece.
Excellent work on the application logic in src/app.js! It's robust and correctly handles all the specified file-moving scenarios. However, the key change requested in the last review is still missing: a test case in tests/moveFiles.test.js to verify that the script fails when attempting to move a directory. This test is essential to confirm that your application meets the requirement to only support moving files.
For your next submission, please remember to add tests for all requirements, including those that check for expected failures. Keep up the great work!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
Anton-Kuchmasov
left a comment
Anton-Kuchmasov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good work, but your commit message is inappropriate and sounds rude, even if it's addressed to an AI mentor
| function fail(msg) { | ||
| console.error(msg); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what's purpose of this function?
3 participants
No description provided.